BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California
    Anaheim California construction expertsAnaheim California construction project management expert witnessesAnaheim California expert witness windowsAnaheim California structural concrete expertAnaheim California testifying construction expert witnessAnaheim California construction expert witnessesAnaheim California structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Expert Witness Engineer Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Expert Witness Engineer Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355
    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535
    Anaheim California Expert Witness Engineer 10/ 10


    Expert Witness Engineer News and Information
    For Anaheim California


    Insurer Must Defend Contractor Against Claims of Faulty Workmanship

    Climate Superfund Litigation: Courts Split on Venue and Intervention in New York and Vermont Cases

    Tender the Defense of a Lawsuit to your Liability Carrier

    Kahana Feld Texas Team Obtains a Summary Judgment Motion

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 5: Valuation of Loss, Sublimits, and Amount of Potential Recovery

    Colorado Abandons the “Completed and Accepted Rule” in Favor of the “Foreseeability Rule” in Determining a Contractor’s Duty to a Third Party After Work Has Been Completed

    Harrisburg Sought Support Before Ruinous Incinerator Retrofit

    McCarthy Workers Test Fall-Protection Harnesses Designed to Better Fit
    Philadelphia Revises Realty Transfer Tax Treatment of Acquired Real Estate Companies

    Fires, Hurricanes, Dangerous Heat: The US Is Reeling From a String of Disasters

    Municipalities Owe a Duty to Pedestrians Regardless of Whether a Sidewalk Presents an “Open and Obvious” Hazardous Condition. (WA)

    Ohio Supreme Court Rules That Wrongful Death Claims Are Subject to the Four-Year Statute of Repose for Medical Claims

    Work to Solve the Mental Health Crisis in Construction

    What’s the Best Way to “Use” a Construction Attorney?

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Lost Productivity or Inefficiency Claim Can Be Challenging to Prove

    Slowing Home Sales Show U.S. Market Lacks Momentum: Economy

    Maine Court Allows $1B Hydropower Transmission Project to Proceed

    The Association of Southern California Defense Counsel (ASCDC) and the Construction Defect Claims Managers Association (CDMA) Annual Construction Defect Seminar

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured In Northern California Super Lawyers 2021!

    The Supreme Court’s Administrative and Regulatory Law Rulings in the 2024 Term and Preview of Cases to Be Decided in Fall 2025

    Case Alert Update: SDV Case Tabbed as One of New York’s Top Three Cases to Watch

    Insurance Coverage for COVID-19? Two N.J. Courts Allow Litigation to Proceed

    ALERT: COVID-19 / Coronavirus-Related Ransomware and Phishing Attacks

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/10/24) – Strong Construction Investment in Data Centers, Increase Use of Proptech in Hospitality and Effects of Remote-Work on Housing Market

    Subsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction Defects

    Seventh Circuit Confirms Additional Insured's Coverage for Alleged Construction Defects

    NYC Supertall Tower Condo Board Sues Over Alleged Construction, Design 'Defects'

    Duuers: Better Proposals with Less Work

    The Top 3 Trends That Will Impact the Construction Industry in 2024

    Best Lawyers Honors 43 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Recognizes Three Partners as 'Lawyers of The Year'

    July 1, 2015 Statutory Changes Affecting Virginia Contractors and Subcontractors

    You May Be Able to Dodge a Bullet, But Not a Gatling Gun

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Denial of Construction Defect Claim

    Construction Defect Disputes: Know Your Measure of Damages!!!!!

    Ritzy NYC Tower Developer Says Residents’ Lawsuit ‘Ill-Advised’

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Indemnity Coverage For Damage Caused by Named Insured

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)

    Product Liability Economic Loss Rule and “Other Property” Damage

    Quick Note: Insurer’s Denial of Coverage Waives Right to Enforce Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    Sept. 11 Victims Rejected by U.S. High Court on Lawsuit

    Florida Court Gives Parties Assigned a Subrogation Claim a Math Lesson

    Insurer Need Not Pay for Rejected Defense When No Reservation of Rights Issued

    Owners Bound by Arbitration Clause on Roofing Shingles Packaging

    Former Zurich Executive to Head Willis North America Construction Insurance Group

    EEOC Suit Alleges Site Managers Bullied Black Workers on NY Project

    SDNY Vacates Arbitration Award for Party-Arbitrator’s Nondisclosures

    Buffett Says ‘No-Brainer’ to Get a Mortgage to Short Rates

    Contractors Can No Longer Make Roof Repairs Following Their Own Inspections

    Court Narrowly Interprets “Faulty Workmanship” Provision

    Construction Costs Absorb Two Big Hits This Quarter

    Payment Bond Surety Entitled to Award of Attorneys’ Fees Although Defended by Principal

    Verdict In Favor Of Insured Homeowner Reversed For Improper Jury Instructions

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    Insurer’s Attempt to Shift Cost of Defense to Another Insurer Found Void as to Public Policy

    Introducing Nomos LLP!

    The Contract Disputes Act: What Every Federal Government Contractor Should Know
    le Stadium Bond Deal Tests Future of Spectator Sports

    NYC Landlord Accused of Skirting Law With Rent-Free Months Offer

    No Duty to Indemnify Where No Duty to Defend

    Historical Long-Tail Claims in California Subject to a Vertical Exhaustion Rule

    New York Team Secures Appellate Win on Behalf of National Home Improvement Chain

    What is a Civil Dispute?

    Utah Supreme Court Allows Citizens to Block Real Estate Development Project by Voter Referendum

    Congratulations to Nine Gibbs Giden Partners Selected to the 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Prospective Additional Insureds May Be Obligated to Arbitrate Coverage Disputes

    When is Mediation Appropriate for Your Construction Case?

    Electronic Signatures On Contracts: Are They Truly Compliant?

    Netherlands’ Developer Presents Modular Homes for Young Professionals

    Last Call: Tokyo Iconic Okura Hotel Meets the Wrecking Ball

    Contractor Allegedly Injured after Slipping on Black Ice Files Suit

    Garlock Five Years Later: Recent Decisions Illustrate Ongoing Obstacles to Asbestos Trust Transparency

    Foreign Entry into the United States Construction, Infrastructure and PPP Markets

    Five Pointers for Enforcing a Non-Compete Agreement in Texas

    Questions of Fact Regarding Collapse of Basement Walls Prevent Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Why’d You Have To Say That?

    Lay Testimony Sufficient to Prove Diminution in Value

    Heat Stress Deaths Show Europe Isn’t Ready for Climate Change

    How the California and Maui Wildfires Will Affect Future Construction Projects

    Construction Venture Sues LAX for Nonpayment

    School District Practice Bulletin: Loose Lips Can Sink More Than Ships

    Will O'Neill Joins Newmeyer Dillion as Partner

    Harmon Tower Demolition on Hold Due to Insurer

    Duuers: Better Proposals with Less Work

    Run Spot...Run!

    Rescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application Reversed

    Warren Renews Criticism of Private Equity’s Role in Housing

    Solutions To 4 Common Law Firm Diversity Challenges

    Colorado Passes Compromise Bill on Construction Defects

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/15/23) – Manufacturing Soars with CHIPS Act, New Threats to U.S. Infrastructure and AI Innovation for One Company

    Insurers Get “Floored” by Court of Appeals Regarding the Presumptive Measure of Damages in Consent Judgments

    The Black Woman Architect Who Hopes to Change the Face of Design in America

    What If Your CCP 998 Offer is Silent on Costs?

    Kiewit and Two Ex-Managers Face Canada Jobsite Fatality Criminal Trial

    California Case Adds Difficulties for Contractors & Material Suppliers

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Jones Provides Testimony Before Florida Senate Committees
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Expert Witness Engineer Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Expert Witness Engineer News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List

    April 08, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain have been selected to the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list for construction litigation. Mr. Heisdorffer has been consistently recognized in recent years for his work in construction litigation and related business disputes. Mr. McLain has been recognized by Super Lawyers each year from 2020 through 2026, following his earlier inclusion on the Rising Stars list from 2009 through 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Maryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court Challenges

    January 21, 2026 —
    Maryland lawmakers have overridden the governor’s veto to enact legislation directing a statewide assessment of climate-related costs, while New Jersey lawmakers are preparing a January committee hearing for the State’s pending Climate Superfund Act. Together, these actions underscore continued state-level interest in both study-based and liability-focused climate-cost attribution frameworks, even as four separate lawsuits challenging state climate superfund statutes in New York and Vermont proceed in federal court. Maryland Legislature Overrides Veto to Advance Climate-Cost Assessment On December 16, the Maryland General Assembly voted to override Governor Wes Moore’s veto of S.B. 149 / H.B. 128, the “Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation – Total Assessed Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Study and Reports” Act. The vote followed the Governor’s announcement, just days earlier, that his administration would fully fund the study mandated by the bill, effectively reversing his prior veto. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    May 14, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan Federman, Partner Thomas Cronin, and Senior Counsel Garrett Lee recently secured a victory in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, on behalf of the firm’s client, an architectural firm, in a liability dispute. The case arose following an entity’s purchase of a 111-unit building for use as an investment or rental property. The plaintiff made claims against the architect of the building, alleging that there were design defects that breached an implied warranty, as well as a negligence claim. GRSM argued that an architect could not be liable for implied warranties, particularly for an implied warranty which no Illinois court has ever recognized. GRSM further argued that Illinois law bars an architect from liability for negligence arising from a duty pursuant to contract under the economic loss doctrine. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    March 17, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter’s client owned a condo, which he rented out. The tenant allegedly assaulted Plaintiff across the street from the condo, resulting in personal injury, including nerve damage. Shanna did the research and writing, and Jeff argued the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court ruled, in pertinent part, that the subject assault off property was not foreseeable, resulting in a complete dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP